Legal Opinion

Pike v. Cain

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 22, 2020No. A164666PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

624 200 v. Cain Pike 30322, April Or2020 App Submitted February 26, 2019; reversed and remanded with instructions to grant post-conviction relief on petitioner’s claim that trial counsel was inadequate under Article I, section 11, for failing to adequately investigate and present evidence of petitioner’s military service; otherwise affirmed April 22, 2020 ADRIAN LESLIE PIKE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Brad CAIN, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution, Defendant-Respondent. Malheur County Circuit Court 15CV1518; A164666

465 P3d 277

Petitioner, a decorated infantryman in the Army,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Green v. FrankeOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Johnson v. PremoOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Monfore v. PerssonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  5. Jackson v. FrankeOregon Supreme Court · 2019

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bacon v. CainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  2. Nichols v. PerssonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. Gwynne v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  4. Bacon v. CainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  5. Gwynne v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API