Legal Opinion

Dingman v. Pahl.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 16, 1920No. 6473PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Bexar County Court; John H. Clark, Judge. Action by I. L. Dingman against Alfred J. Pahl in which defendant filed a cross-action.Judgment for defendant on his cross-action, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtPly, C. J.

This is a suit on a promissory note for $320, instituted by appellant against appellee, who admitted execution of the note, and filed a cross-action for $1,000 damages alleged to have accrued by reason of fraudulent representations made in connection with the sale of land, for which he had executed five promissory notes in the sum of $320 each. Appellee alleged that four of the notes were secured by a vendor’s lien on the land, and had passed into the hands of innocent purchasers ; that the fifth, which formed the basis of the suit, was not secured by lien, and remained in the hands of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of San Antonio v. BodemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tysk v. GriggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. Stovall v. FinneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Tinsley v. MetzlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Konz v. PrattCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API