Legal Opinion
O. W. Siebert Co. v. Kramer
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 4, 1980PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Edwin Kassoff, J.
This action by a contract vendee for the return of its down payment raises issues of marketability and insurability of title to certain improved real property located at 86-88 Sancho Street, Holliswood, in the County of Queens. Defendants, record owners, have counterclaimed for damages for breach of contract. A trial without a jury was held before me and, from the credible evidence adduced thereat, I find the following:
On July 3, 1979, the attorneys for the sellers forwarded to the purchaser’s attorney an original and two copies of the proposed contract of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Junius Construction Corp. v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Leading Building Corp. v. SegreteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Colonial Diversified, Inc. v. Assured Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Bibber v. WeberNew York Supreme Court · 1951
- Petterson v. Radspi Realty & Coal Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- CPS Operating Co. v. Pathmark Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010