Legal Opinion · Dissent

CPS Operating Co. v. Pathmark Stores, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 1, 2010Published

1Dissent

Saxe, J.E (dissenting).

Today, the majority ignores a clear and

unássailable land use restriction contained in a land disposition agreement entered into many years ago by the City of New York’s Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD) and a prior purchaser of the land, as part of an urban renewal plan. Its ruling would authorize a transfer of property in the absence of HPD approval of the conveyance, although the land disposition agreement concerning the property requires that any such transfer first be approved by HPD. I believe that this restriction on transfers contained in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Neponsit Property Owners' Ass'n v. Emigrant Industrial Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. 328 Owners Corp. v. 330 West 86 Oaks Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. O. W. Siebert Co. v. KramerNew York Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API