CPS Operating Co. v. Pathmark Stores, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Saxe, J.E (dissenting).
Today, the majority ignores a clear and
unássailable land use restriction contained in a land disposition agreement entered into many years ago by the City of New York’s Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD) and a prior purchaser of the land, as part of an urban renewal plan. Its ruling would authorize a transfer of property in the absence of HPD approval of the conveyance, although the land disposition agreement concerning the property requires that any such transfer first be approved by HPD. I believe that this restriction on transfers contained in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Neponsit Property Owners' Ass'n v. Emigrant Industrial Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- 328 Owners Corp. v. 330 West 86 Oaks Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2007
- O. W. Siebert Co. v. KramerNew York Supreme Court · 1980