Curtis v. Redevelopment Authority
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Mencer,
This case arises on cross appeals, brought by the Redevelopment Authority of the City of Philadelphia (Authority) and William D. and Winifred M. Glockner on one side and Dewey Lee Curtis on the other. Curtis commenced this action by bringing a suit in equity against the Glockners and- the Authority, seeking to have the Glockners’ deed to property located at 220 Delancey Street reformed to reflect the reservation of an easement in favor of Curtis’ property over an alleyway 3 feet wide running from the .Curtis property over the Glockner property.to Delancey Street. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Schroeder v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Piercing Pagoda, Inc. v. HoffnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Pruner EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Pocono Pines Corp. v. Pennsylvania Game CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Township of Cornplanter v. McGregorCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000