Legal Opinion

Martek Biosciences Corp. v. Nutrinova Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided October 30, 2007No. Civil Action 03-896 GMSPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

GREGORY M. SLEET, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The plaintiff, Martek Biosciences Corporation (“Martek”), filed the above-captioned action- against Nutrinova Inc. and Nutrinova Nutrition Specialties & Food Ingredients GMBH 1 (collectively, “Lonza” or the “defendants”) on September 23, 2003, alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos. 6,607,900 (the “'900 patent”) and 6,451,567 (the “'567 patent”) by Lonza’s activities with regard to its docosahexaenoic acid (“DHA”) product, produced by microalgae and marketed under the brand names DHActiveTM, Nutrinova® DHA, and Lonza DHA. In…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  5. Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Martek Biosciences Corp. v. Nutrinova, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  2. TruePosition Inc. v. ANDREW CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2008
  3. Belden Technologies Inc. v. Superior Essex Communications LPDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2011
  4. Pfizer Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
  5. Robert Bosch, LLC v. Pylon Manufacturing Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API