Legal Opinion

Hawes v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 2, 1955No. 398PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

Under the Workmen’s Compensation Act the Industrial Commission is constituted the fact-finding body, and their findings, if supported by competent evidence, are “conclusive and binding as to all questions of fact.” G.S. 97-86; Cooper v. Ice Co., 230 N.C. 43, 51 S.E. 2d 889. This is true even though there may be competent evidence which would have supported a contrary finding. Creighton v. Snipes, 227 N.C. 90, 40 S.E. 2d 612. However, this does not mean that the conclusions of the Commission based upon the facts found are in all respects unexceptionable. Perley v. Paving Co., 228 N.C. 479, 46…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hayes v. . Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. Hayes v. Board of Trustees of Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. Beach v. . McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Whitted v. . Palmer-Bee Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. Income Life Ins. Co. v. MitchellTennessee Supreme Court · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Askew v. LEONARD TIRE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. English Mica Co. v. Avery County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API