Ruf v. Davis
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, Justice.
Bill by appellees, complainants in the court below, to declare a deed, absolute in terms, a mortgage and for redemption.
The respondent, appellant here, demurred to the bill assigning numerous grounds therefor, but these demurrers were overruled by the court.
The hill is very similar in its essential averments to the bill filed in the case of Richardson v. Curlee et al., reported in 229 Ala. 505, 158 So. 189. . We held the bill sufficient in that case as against similar demurrers filed to the bill in this cause. We do not doubt the sufficiency of the bill in this cause.
The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Richardson v. CurleeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Alabama Farm Bureau Credit Corporation v. HelmsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Hendon v. HendonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wheeler v. WheelerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Federal Land Bank of New Orleans v. SuttonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Parker v. FullerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Redwine v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Redwine v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950