Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Bank of North America & Trust Co.

Pennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County

Decided November 14, 1923Published

1Opinion of the Court

Leíwis, J.,

— This is a rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defence.

The action is one on a draft for $166, dated April 26, 1923, issued by the defendant bank upon the Metropolitan Trust Company of New York City to the order of C. E. Harmon.

The statement sets forth that on May 3, 1923, Harmon, the payee of the draft, transferred it for valuable consideration to the plaintiff; that the draft was presented for payment to the Metropolitan Trust Company, but that the defendant bank — The Bank of North America and Trust Company — which issued it, stopped payment on it.

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. German N. Bank v. Farmers' D. N. BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  2. Saylor v. BushongSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  3. Monongahela National Bank v. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  4. Martz v. W. H. Wilcox Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  5. Kohn v. HornungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API