Gilcrest v. Nantker
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Buffalo county. Tried below before Holcomb, J. References: Hornv. Queen, 4 Neb., 108; Thompson v. Sharp, 17 Neb., 71; Luce v. Foster, 42 Neb., 818; White v. Gray, 61 N. W. Rep. [Ia.], 173; Senn v. Joseph, 17 So. Rep. [Ala.], 543; Taylor v. Evans, 29 S. W. Rep. [Tex.], 172; Graham v. Reno, 38 Pac.
Read the full summary
Error from the district court of Buffalo county. Tried below before Holcomb, J. References: Hornv. Queen, 4 Neb., 108; Thompson v. Sharp, 17 Neb., 71; Luce v. Foster, 42 Neb., 818; White v. Gray, 61 N. W. Rep. [Ia.], 173; Senn v. Joseph, 17 So. Rep. [Ala.], 543; Taylor v. Evans, 29 S. W. Rep. [Tex.], 172; Graham v. Reno, 38 Pac. Rep. [Colo.], 835; Erslcine v. Mellrath, 62 N. W. Rep. [Minn.], 1130; Fischer v. Hetherington, 32 N. Y. Sup., 795; Beardsley v. Pope, 32 N. Y. Sup., 926; Smithson v. Smithson, 37 Neb., 539; Gluts v. Garter, 12 Neb., 113; Stoll v. Sheldon, 13 Neb., 207; Dalton v. West…
1Opinion of the CourtNoryal, J.
This was an action in equity brought in the court below by the plaintiff in error against Henry Nantker to obtain a new trial in a suit at law between the same parties. A general demurrer to the petition urns sustained and the cause dismissed. The *59original action was to recover damages for alleged deceit and false representations in the sale of a horse by Nantker to Gilcrest. The verdict was for the defendant. Plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was overruled, and judgment was rendered for the defendant, which was affirmed by this court at the September, 1894, term, for the reason the petition…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Proctor v. PettittNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
- Gould v. LoughranNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
- Osborn v. GehrNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
- Thompson v. SharpNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
- Hughes v. HouselNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gilbert v. MarrowNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Baldwin v. BurtNebraska Supreme Court · 1898