Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Housel

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1892PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the district court for Douglas county. Tried below before Groff, J. cited, as to the point discussed in the opinion : Hemmer v. Wolfer, 124 111., 435 ; Turner v. Jenkins, 79 Id., 228; Haworth v. Huling, 87 Id., 23; Miller v. Handy, 40 Id., 448; Harman v. Moore, 112 Ind., 221; Rubush v. State, Id., 107; Harnish v. Bramer, 71 Cal., 155; Nevill v. Pope, 95 N. Car., 346.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

Irene Hughes brought this suit in the court below against Charles C. Housel and William Hughes alleging in her petition:

“That she is the only surviving heir of Rebecca C. A. Hughes, deceased, who departed this life intestate on or about the 27th day of November, 1867, seized in fee simple of the following described real property, to-wit: Lot three (3), block one hundred and sixty-five (165), in the city of Omaha, Douglas county, Nebraska. And plaintiff avers that as such heir she is the owner in rever*704sion of said property after the estate by curtesy of William Hughes is determined.
“ But…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ManningNebraska Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Aldrich v. SteenNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Boden v. MierNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Hall v. HooperNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Fickes v. Vick Bros.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Gilcrest v. NantkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API