Tenney v. Mobil Oil Corp.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1DissentStolz, Judge
Mrs. Tenney was on the premises of the defendant’s service station as an invitee, and thus the defendants owed her the duty of exercising ordinary care in keeping the premises and approaches safe. Code § 105-401. The plaintiff, at trial, contended that Mobil Oil failed in its duty. The only evidence presented to support this contention was that the plaintiff was in fact injured. Beyond that, there is no conflict in the evidence, nor any suggestion that the defendant was negligent. "The only evidence relied on . . . was entirely circumstantial and amounted to no more than the fact that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chenall v. Palmer Brick Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Krogg v. Atlanta & West Point RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- Southeastern Fidelity Insurance v. HeardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Pinkerton's, Inc. v. Palmer, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Darlington Corp. v. PinchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.