Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Wadley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 12, 1923No. 3465PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, J..The exception is to the judgment allowing the grandchildren of W. 0. Wadley, being great grandchildren of W. M. Wadley, testator, to participate in the distribution of the estate. The correctness of the decision depends upon a proper construction of the will. An estate in remainder is 'one limited to be enjoyed after another estate is determined or at a time specified in the future (Civil Code, § 3674), and is either vested or contingent, A vested remainder is one limited to a certain person at a certain time or upon the happening of a necessary event. A contingent remainder is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gibson v. HardawaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  2. Moore v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. Crumley v. ScalesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  4. Curles v. Wade & BrimberrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  5. Patterson v. PattersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tate v. TateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  2. Ethridge v. LeaptrotSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  3. Mathews v. GraddickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API