Legal Opinion

Mathews v. Graddick

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 6, 1924No. 4101Published

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

The petitioner does not allege such title in the land as would authorize the court to adjudge the forfeiture of the estate of the first taker, and to decree title in the petitioner free of condition. Her interest in the fifty acres of land in the southeast portion of land lot 19 was either no interest whatever or that of a contingent remainder — contingent upon the petitioner surviving her father, C. C. Graddick. If the latter and she predeceased her father, she being the only child, the title would revert to the surviving brothers and sisters of C. C. Graddick. Curles v. Wade, 150 Ga. 142…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Curles v. Wade & BrimberrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  2. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  3. Roberts v. WadleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API