City of Seattle v. Klein
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*556¶1 The “right to appeal in all cases” is expressly guaranteed by our Washington Constitution. Wash. Const. art. I, § 22.1 The only means by which such an individual constitutional right in Washington may be relinquished is by a voluntary, knowing, and intelligent waiver. In this case, the city of Seattle (City) claims the fugitive disentitlement doctrine (FDD) serves to abrogate the respondents’ constitutionally guaranteed right to appeal. The FDD is a doctrine that presumes forfeiture rather than requiring a knowing waiver of the important right of appeal. We reject this doctrine insofar as…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Ronald J. GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Eisler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- State v. RempelWashington Supreme Court · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. QuismundoWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. QuismundoWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- BAINBRIDGE POLICE GUILD v. City of PuyallupWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- Bainbridge Island Police Guild v. City of PuyallupWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.