Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Klein

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 2007No. 79973-3PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*556¶1 The “right to appeal in all cases” is expressly guaranteed by our Washington Constitution. Wash. Const. art. I, § 22.1 The only means by which such an individual constitutional right in Washington may be relinquished is by a voluntary, knowing, and intelligent waiver. In this case, the city of Seattle (City) claims the fugitive disentitlement doctrine (FDD) serves to abrogate the respondents’ constitutionally guaranteed right to appeal. The FDD is a doctrine that presumes forfeiture rather than requiring a knowing waiver of the important right of appeal. We reject this doctrine insofar as…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. Ronald J. GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  3. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Eisler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. State v. RempelWashington Supreme Court · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. QuismundoWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. QuismundoWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. BAINBRIDGE POLICE GUILD v. City of PuyallupWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Bainbridge Island Police Guild v. City of PuyallupWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API