Legal Opinion
General Motors Corp. v. Monte Zinn Chevrolet Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 13, 2000No. 99AP-261, 99AP-262 and 99AP-263PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bowman, Judge.
Appellants, Monte Zinn Chevrolet Company and Monte Zinn Motor Company (“Monte Zinn”), appeal a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas reversing an order of the Ohio Motor Vehicle Dealers Board (“board”) that appellees, General Motors Corporation, Chrysler Corporation, and Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., could not terminate their respective automobile dealer franchises with appellants because appellees had not established good cause. Appellants present the following assignment of error for review:
“The court of common pleas erred in reversing the decision of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ohio Historical Society v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- General Motors Corp. v. Joe O'Brien Chevrolet, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997
- Chesapeake Ford, Inc. v. Ohio Motor Vehicle Dealers BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Jurek v. Ohio Motor Vehicle Dealers BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bob Krihwan Pontiac-GMC Truck, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2001
- Bob Krihwan Pontiac-GMC Truck, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2001