Legal Opinion

Frazier v. Frazier

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 15, 1955No. 17066PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Baker, Chief Justice.

There are two distinct and separate appeals in this case, which may be denominated as the main appeal and the subsidiary appeal. These appeals have been so dealt with by counsel, separate briefs having' been filed; and while the main appeal was orally argued in addition to the printed briefs filed, the subsidiary appeal was submitted on the printed briefs. We will so deal with them herein.

In that in the main appeal the defendant is the appellant, and in the subsidiary or secondary appeal the plaintiff is the appellant, we will hereinafter refer to the parties to this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  2. Machado v. MachadoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  3. Mincey v. MinceySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
  4. Graves v. GravesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1952
  5. Forester v. ForesterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Janasik v. Fairway Oaks Villas Horizontal Property RegimeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  2. Porter v. PorterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  3. Lee v. LeeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  4. Todd v. ToddSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  5. DuBose v. DuBoseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API