Board of Regents of University & State Colleges v. Frohmiller
Arizona Supreme Court
1DissentPhelps, Justice
I am sorry to dissent from the majority opinion in this case but feel constrained to do so upon the ground that mandamus does not lie in this case.
Section 28-201, A.C.A.1939, provides in so far as we are here concerned that: “The writ of mandamus may be issued by the supreme or superior court on the verified complaint of the party beneficially interested, to any inferior tribunal, corporation, board, * * *, or person, to compel the performance of an act which the law specially imposes as a duty resulting from an office, trust or station, * *
While the creditors are the parties primarily…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Wilbur v. United States Ex Rel. KadrieSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Welch v. SwaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Threadgill v. Cross, Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. United States Ex Rel. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Welch v. SwaseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.