Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Punch & Shear Co. v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 3, 1909No. 15,809PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Atchison district court; Benjamin F. Hudson, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Graves, J.:

This is an action of replevin to recover the possession of a punch-and-shear machine. The action was commenced in the district court of Atchisoh county, where a demurrer to the evidence was sustained and judgment rendered in favor of the defendant. From this judgment the-plaintiff prosecuted error to this court. (72 Kan. 432.) The judgment was reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial. Upon a retrial the defendant again recovered, and the plaintiff prosecutes error.

The plaintiff manufactures and sells punch-and-shear machines. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Town of Leroy v. McConnellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  2. Cincinnati Punch & Shear Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Frazier v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. Buxton v. ColverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  3. City Center Bank v. City of RosedaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  4. Nichols & Shepard Co. v. SwisherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  5. Bloom Equity Exchange v. StephansSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API