Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Punch & Shear Co. v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 9, 1905No. 14,358PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Atchison district court; Benjamin F. Hudson, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*433The opinion of the court was delivered by

Greene, J.:

The plaintiff in this action sought by replevin to recover from the defendant a certain punch- and-shear machine that it had previously delivered to him under a contract of sale. The court sustained a demurrer to the plaintiff’s evidence, and rendered a judgment accordingly. This is alleged as error.

It appears that the plaintiff contracted to sell and deliver to the defendant a certain punch-and-shear machine, for which the defendant agreed to pay $300. A perfect machine was shipped, and delivered to the defendant at his place of business in…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Punch & Shear Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  2. Dougherty Bros. Tent & Awning Co. v. Peru-Van Zandt Implement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API