Legal Opinion
Skillman v. Conner
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided July 23, 1937No. 4PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Harrington, J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
It appears from the declaration that the alleged negligent acts relied on by the plaintiff were committed in the State of Maryland, and the question raised by the demurrer is whether, in view of the provisions of Chapter 26 of Volume 38, Laws of Delaware, her action can be brought in this State, though an action on the case for negligence is a transitory action. See Reynolds v. Day, 79 Wash. 499, 140 P. 681, L. R. A. 1916A, 432; Loranger v. Nadeau, 215 Cal. 362, 10 P. (2d) 63, 84 A. L. R. 1264. That statute, among other things, provides: “No…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Loucks v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Dennick v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Herrick v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Loranger v. NadeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Skutt v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. LakeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
- Zahn v. Transamerica CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Friday v. SmootSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
- J.S. Alberici Construction Co. v. Mid-West Conveyor Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2000
- State v. HalkoSuperior Court of Delaware · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.