Legal Opinion

Polk v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 11, 2006No. 05-403 CPublished

1Opinion of the Court

*332 OPINION AND ORDER

SMITH, Senior Judge.

Plaintiff comes before this Court challenging his 1987 Navy discharge as improper due to a document erroneously contained in his record. He further requests that “the 1987 Statu[t]e of limitations be lifted in this claim in part because of the Navy’s usage of the ‘Half of Loaf Doctrine.’ ” Compl. ¶ 1. Defendant has filed a Motion to Dismiss or in the alternative, a Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record. Because the Court finds that Plaintiffs action is barred by the statute of limitations, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and it is not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gabriel J. Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  2. Sweed v. DretkeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Denton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  4. Bonen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  5. Charles H. Debow, Jr. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API