Fogleman v. State

This was an indictment for larceny. The appellant was found guilty, and sentenced, after a motion for a new trial had been overruled. Error is assigned upon the overruling of that motion.

The question most pressed by counsel is 'upon the refusal’ of the court to give to the jury the rules of law (as they are supposed by the argument to be) concerning the effect of the testimony of an accomplice. But we cannot perceive that the question is in the case. The State called a: witness who had been charged with some crime—its nature ■ is not disclosed—which had no connection whatever with the offense…