Legal Opinion

Myla Nauman v. Abbott Laboratories

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 3, 2012No. 10-2272PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SYKES, Circuit Judge.

Abbott Laboratories decided to “spin” its Hospital Products Division (“HPD”), creating a separate company called Hospira. Prior to the spin, HPD employees had access to Abbott’s pension plan. After the spin, however, HPD employees became employees of Hospira, which did not offer a pension plan but instead offered an enhanced 401(k) plan with an employer-matching provision. The terms of the spin included reciprocal no-hire policies, meaning that for two years post-spin, Abbott would not hire Hospira employees or retirees, and Hospira would-not hire Abbott employees or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Pegram v. HerdrichSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Fairley v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  4. Serwatka v. Rockwell Automation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Teamsters Local Union No. 705 v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  2. Deka v. Countryside Ass'n for People with Disabilities, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
  3. Clapper v. United Airlines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
  4. Fountain v. Zimmer Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
  5. Fountain v. Zimmer Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API