Legal Opinion
Consolidated Vultee Aircraft Corp. v. Maurice A. Garbell, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 13, 1953No. 12885PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment which, in an action by appellees, Maurice A. Gar-bell, Inc., and Garbell Research Foundation, against appellants, Consolidated Vul-tee Aircraft Corporation, hereafter called Consolidated, and American Airlines, Inc., hereafter called American, held that claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 12 of patent No. 2,441,758 were valid and infringed by appellants, enjoined further infringement thereof and ordered an accounting of profits and damages.
The patent was for an airplane wing called a fluid-foil lifting surface — an alleged invention of Maurice A.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. Masonite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- United States v. Dubilier Condenser CorpSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Solomons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Harry A. Pursche v. Atlas Scraper and Engineering Co., a Corporation, Atlas Scraper and Engineering Co., a Corporation v. Harry A. PurscheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Maurice A. Garbell, Inc. v. Boeing CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1973
- Hartley Pen Co. v. Lindy Pen Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1954
- Mine Safety Appliances Company and United Tanks, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Max C. McElmurry and White River Technologies, Inc. v. Arkansas Power & Light Company, Entergy Corporation and Middle South UtilitiesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.