Watkins v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KEITH, Commissioner.
Appellant was indicted in two cases of felony theft and waived his right to be tried separately on the individual cases and they were tried before the same jury. Appellant pleaded not guilty but was found guilty in each instance; his punishment was fixed by the jury at confinement for ten years in each case. 1
Appellant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence and we simply note that appellant received money from the complaining witnesses as an investment in a company he purportedly was organizing. The company failed and the complainants lost their money.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- United States v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Michael Joseph Gurleski and Dorothy Villafranca v. United States of America, Frank Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Schick v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Yazdchi v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
- Fierro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Daniels v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.