Legal Opinion

State v. Hugenberg

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 21, 1977No. 774SC268PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendant makes five arguments covering ten assignments of error.

I

In the presentation of its evidence the State introduced photographs of the body of the deceased. Defendant contends that admission of these exhibits into evidence constitutes prejudicial error because the photographs portray such horrible and gruesome details that they serve no purpose except to inflame and prejudice the jury.

As defendant correctly points out, properly authenticated photographs of the body of a homicide victim may be introduced into *94evidence under proper instructions limiting their use to that of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. WestbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. State v. CutshallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. . BrantleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shepherd v. OliverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API