Legal Opinion

Engler v. General Electric Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 19, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANDELBAUM, District Judge.

The defendant’s motion addressed to the second amended complaint seeks the following relief: First, a dismissal of certain causes of action contained in the complaint; second, to strike out certain matter from the complaint; and third, to direct the plaintiff to serve a bill of particulars.

The Motion to Dismiss.

The plaintiff appears in person. A detailed discussion of the facts is unnecessary. The sufficiency of the plaintiff’s first amended complaint was considered by Judge Hulbert who, in an opinion dated July 31, 1939, carefully set forth all the necessary facts…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Mitchell & Weber, Inc. v. Williams Bridge Mills, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1936

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pacific-Atlantic Steamship Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1955
  2. Moran v. ShubertDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API