Legal Opinion

Jeffrey M. Kuha v. City of Minnetonka

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 8, 2003No. 02-1081PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MELLOY, Circuit Judge.

After fleeing a routine traffic stop in the early morning hours, the plaintiff-appellant, Jeffrey M. Kuha, was tracked to a grassy field by two police officers and a police dog. The dog, trained to bite and hold until commanded to release, bit Kuha near his groin, severing his femoral artery. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Kuha brought an excessive force claim against the City of Minnetonka and several officers 1 involved in the incident. Kuha also brought state tort claims for negligence, assault, and battery. The district court granted summary judgment to the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Otero v. WoodDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2004
  2. Nicholas Dennen v. City of Duluth S.R. Peterson John DoesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  3. Tilson v. City of ElkhartCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  4. Henry Szabla v. City Of Brooklyn ParkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  5. Hyatt v. Anoka Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API