Legal Opinion

State v. Polk

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 28, 2015No. 31935-1-IIIPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLawrence-Berrey, J.

¶1 A jury found David Polk guilty of four counts of second degree dealing in depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct and four counts of second degree possession of depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct. He raises four issues on appeal. First, he contends that his four convictions for second degree possession violate the prohibition against double jeopardy because the offense of second degree possession of depictions is one unit of prosecution. Second, he contends that the State failed to present sufficient evidence to prove three of the counts of second…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Of Washington v. David NovickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  2. State v. McAninchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. State Of Washington v. John RingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. State Of Washington v. Kenneth Alfred Linville, Jr.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  5. State Of Washington, V Albert K. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API