Legal Opinion

Pond v. Sweetser

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1882No. 9393PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Grant Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, C. J.

The circuit court sustained demurrers respectively to the complaint of the appellant Pond, as administrator of the estate of Bartholomew Anderson, and to the cross complaint of the appellant Amanda Anderson; and error is assigned upon these rulings. The averments in each of these complaints and the exhibits filed therewith are substantially identical. That of the administrator is to the effect, and mainly of the tenor, following:

Isaac P. Pond, administrator, etc., complains of David B. Sweetser (and others named) and says that said Bartholomew Anderson died intestate on the 27th day of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hibernia National Bank v. . LacombeNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Ames Iron Works v. WarrenIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. MacKenzie v. CasteelIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Buchanan v. BuchananSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  3. Littell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Pry v. PryIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Leazenby v. Clinton County Bank & Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API