Legal Opinion

Leazenby v. Clinton County Bank & Trust Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 28, 1976No. 2-1274A304PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLybrook, J.

Defendant-appellant, Administrator. of the Estate of Cloyd H. Leazenby, deceased (hereinafter referred to as Cloyd) appeals the judgment of the trial court in favor of the plaintiff-appellee, Clinton County Bank and Trust Company (Bank). The judgment determined that the trust created by Elsie G. Leazenby, who predeceased her husband, Cloyd, was a valid inter vivos trust which is not subject to the administration of her estate.

We affirm.

The facts most relevant to this appeal indicated that Cloyd H. and Elsie G. Leazenby were married in 1951, the second marriage for each. Cloyd was a farmer…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Newman v. DoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Bolles v. Toledo Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Montgomery v. MichaelsIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Brown v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Leader Publishing Co. v. Grant Trust & Savings Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Walker v. LawsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Matter of Estate of PalamaraIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Montgomery v. Supervised Administration of the Estate of MontgomeryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Walker v. LawsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. In the Matter of WalzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API