Planters Chemical & Oil Co. v. Waller &. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Talladega. City Court. Heard, before Hon. G. K. Miller. Assumpsit ''by the Planters, Chemical & Oil Go., against A. Waller & Co., and others, with writ of garnishment and attachment in aid of suit. Prom a judgment of dismissal plaintiffs appeal. The court erred in dismissing and dissolving the garnishee, dismissing the attachment and discharging the garnishee. — L. & N. R. R. Go. v. Dooley, 78 Ala. 524; E. T. & G. Ry.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Talladega. City Court. Heard, before Hon. G. K. Miller. Assumpsit ''by the Planters, Chemical & Oil Go., against A. Waller & Co., and others, with writ of garnishment and attachment in aid of suit. Prom a judgment of dismissal plaintiffs appeal. The court erred in dismissing and dissolving the garnishee, dismissing the attachment and discharging the garnishee. — L. & N. R. R. Go. v. Dooley, 78 Ala. 524; E. T. & G. Ry. Go. v. Kennedy, 83 Ala. 642; L. & N. R. R. Go. v. Steiner & Lob-man, 128 Ala. 253; A. G. S. v; Ghumley, 92 Ala. 317; L. & N. v; Nash, 118 Ala. 477;' Penoyer v; Neff,…
1Opinion of the CourtDenson, J.
Planters’ Chemical & Oil Company, an Alabama corporation, with its home office at Talladega, Ala.,- commenced its action by attachment in the'city court of Talladega, against A. Waller & Co., a¡ Kentucky corporation, with its home office at Henderson, Ky., for the purpose of-collecting a debt claimed-to be due it-by the defendant. The -attachment was ■ executed by summoning J. F. Hanks Company, an Alabama corporation, with home office at Talladega, Ala., to answer as garnishee. Code 1896; § 540. The garnishee answered indebtedness, in the sum of $545.54. on a contract made by it with the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SturmSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. DeerSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Bragg v. GaynorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. DooleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jos. Joseph. & Bros. v. Hoffman & McNeillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Forest Products Co. v. MagistrelliSuperior Court of Delaware · 1940
- Shuttleworth & Co. v. Marx & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. McCartySupreme Court of Alabama · 1915