Legal Opinion
Krohnberg v. Pass
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 23, 1932No. 29,149PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Taxpayers’ action to have adjudged void an agreement between the defendant school district and the defendants George Pass, Jr. and P. T. Hockey, architects; to enjoin them from performing it; and for a money judgment against the individual defendants. An application for a temporary injunction was submitted on the pleadings and affidavits and was denied. The plaintiffs appeal.
The action involves the validity of a contract of May 13, 1932, between the defendant school district and the defendant architects for their services in connection with the erection of a school building. This contract…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hibbs v. ArensbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Hunter v. Whiteaker & WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Stratton v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Johnson-Olmsted Realty Co. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
- Cress, Trustee v. State, Ex Rel.Indiana Supreme Court · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Louisiana v. McIlhennySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- Foss v. SpitznagelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
- Attlin Construction, Inc. v. Muncie Community SchoolsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- McMaster Construction, Inc. v. Board of RegentsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Butler v. HatfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.