Legal Opinion

McMaster Construction, Inc. v. Board of Regents

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 4, 1997No. 86856PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HODGES, Justice.

The threshold issue in this appeal is whether the management construction contracts entered into by the University of Central OHahoma (UCO) and defendants Flinteo and Sverdrup Facilities (construction management companies) are subject to the com petitive bidding procedures as set forth in the Oklahoma Public Bidding Act (Act). 1

I. Facts

In 1992, the people of Oklahoma authorized a bond issue for capital improvements to UCO. The Board of Regents of Oklahoma Colleges (Regents) approved UCO’s plan to utilize construction managers 2 for the improvements rather than utilizing a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. City of Inglewood-Los Angeles County Civic Center Authority v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Gulf Bitulithic Co. v. Nueces CountyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  3. Johnston v. LanterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  4. Carpet City, Inc. v. Stillwater Municipal Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  5. Achen-Gardner, Inc. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Broken Arrow v. Bass Pro Outdoor World, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  2. Shively v. Belleville Township High School District No. 201Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  3. City of Broken Arrow v. Bass Pro Outdoor World, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  4. RSP Architects, Ltd. v. Five Star Development Resort Communities, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  5. Bradley v. Iowa Department of PersonnelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API