Legal Opinion

Deke v. Huenkemeier

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1913PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appear from the Circuit Court of Stephenson county; the Hon. Arthur H. Erost, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Vickers

Appellant, Mary E. Deke, filed a bill in the circuit court of Stephenson county for the purpose of setting aside a conveyance of real estate made by her husband, Joseph Deke, to Ida Huenkemeíer, his daughter by a former marriage. The bill alleges that appellant and Joseph Deke became engaged to marry on June 18, 1905; that prior to said marriage Deke had represented to appellant that he was owner of a large quantity of real estate valued at $25,000 and possessed'an income therefrom of $1800 annually; that Deke often pointed out his houses to her before their marriage and showed her eighteen…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Goff v. GoffWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Thayer v. ThayerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1842
  3. Stroup v. StroupIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Cranson v. CransonMichigan Supreme Court · 1856
  5. Chandler v. HollingsworthCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1867

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Deke v. HuenkemeierIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Geiger v. MerleIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Jarvis v. JarvisIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Franceschi v. FranceschiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945
  5. Bozarth v. BozarthIllinois Supreme Court · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API