Legal Opinion

Bozarth v. Bozarth

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1948No. 30355. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Murphy

Plaintiff, Reedie M. Bozarth, started this action in the circuit court of Wayne County under the Forcible Entry and Detainer Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1947, chap. 57,) to obtain possession of 80 acres of farm land located in that county. Pearl Bozarth was the sole defendant. She appeared and filed an answer and counterclaim. The final action taken in the trial court on the matters set forth in the counterclaim was to dismiss the third amended counterclaim on plaintiff’s motion. Defendant elected to stand by her pleading. Thereafter, plaintiff filed a motion for a summary judgment and supported the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Dunbar v. DunbarIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Deke v. HuenkemeierIllinois Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Moore v. MooreIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Noe v. NoeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  3. Hurst v. DavisWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Pruitt v. Motor Cargo, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  5. In Re Estate of GoldsteinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API