Legal Opinion
Hogan v. Maryland State Dental Ass'n
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided March 8, 2004No. 589, Sept. Term, 2003PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES R. EYLER, Judge.
The question presented by this appeal is whether dental patients who, at any time, received dental fillings containing mercury have stated a legally cognizable claim against the State professional association for dentists for (1) violation of the Maryland Consumer Protection Act and (2) fraud. We answer that question in the negative, and therefore, we shall affirm the judgment of the circuit court.
Facts
On February 21, 2002, Lisa Hogan, one of two appellants, filed a complaint in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City against The American Dental Association (ADA) and the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Impala Platinum Ltd. v. Impala Sales (U.S.A.), Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Martens Chevrolet, Inc. v. SeneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Green v. H & R BLOCK, INC.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Morris v. Osmose Wood PreservingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Allied Investment Corp. v. JasenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- In re Rust-Oleum Restore Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Chambers v. King Buick GMC, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Brass Metal Products, Inc. v. E-J Enterprises Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Alexander v. Washington Gas Light Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Endosurg Medical, Inc. v. Endomaster Medical, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2014
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.