Legal Opinion

Denham v. Lack

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 22, 1940No. 4-5934PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcHaney, J.

On November 4, 1925, appellants, Jesse and Eula Denham, husband and wife, executed their promissory note for $500, due and payable October 1, 1926, with interest at 10 per cent, from date, to D. W. Boyd, which was secured by mortgage on certain real property in St. Francis, Arkansas. Some payments were made on said note, the last being on February 6, 1932, as found by the court. Boyd assigned said note and mortgage to appellee, A. D. Lack, and lie in turn assigned same to appellee, B. F. Lack. At the collector’s sale in June, 1929, said property was sold for the taxes of 1928 to A. D. Lack…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
  2. Dicken v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Karnes v. MarrowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Fulk v. GaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  3. Tucker v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  4. Braun v. AskewSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  5. Fulk v. GaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API