Legal Opinion

City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Smith)

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 25, 2008No. 768 C.D. 2007PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge LEAVITT.

The City of Philadelphia (Employer) petitions for review of an adjudication of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) denying both its termination petition and petition to review a utilization review determination (UR petition), on remand from this Court. In doing so, the Board affirmed the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) that Eddie Smith (Claimant) proved that his work-related injuries exceeded what had been listed on the Notice of Compensation Pay able (NCP) and that Employer failed to prove that Claimant was fully recovered from the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Greenwich Collieries v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Hoffmaster v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Senco Products, Inc.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Sherrod v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cinram Manufacturing, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. A. Heard v. WCAB (Philadelphia Parking Authority)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  3. Cinram Manufacturing, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Eddystone Borough v. WCAB (Conner)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. T. Burns v. WCAB (Commonwealth of PA/DPW)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API