Legal Opinion

Scott C. Moody, Inc. v. Staar Surgical Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 23, 2011No. G043230PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOORE, J.

The court made a ruling at sidebar that counsel should not inquire into a particular area. Counsel proceeded to do exactly what the court ordered him not to do. The trial court found counsel knowingly violated its order and imposed a $1,500 sanction under Code of Civil Procedure section 177.5. (Unless otherwise noted, all statutory references are to the Code of Civil Procedure.) We affirm the court’s order.

I

FACTS

Appellant Daniel J. Callahan, an attorney at law, appeals from an order imposing sanctions against him in the amount of $1,500 pursuant to section 177.5. The following…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moyal v. LanphearCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. People v. Frankie J.California Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. People v. ChongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. People v. WardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Winikow v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. Landers, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. People v. WhitusAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2012
  3. N.D. v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2026
  4. People v. Brown CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. People v. LandersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API