Scott C. Moody, Inc. v. Staar Surgical Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOORE, J.
The court made a ruling at sidebar that counsel should not inquire into a particular area. Counsel proceeded to do exactly what the court ordered him not to do. The trial court found counsel knowingly violated its order and imposed a $1,500 sanction under Code of Civil Procedure section 177.5. (Unless otherwise noted, all statutory references are to the Code of Civil Procedure.) We affirm the court’s order.
I
FACTS
Appellant Daniel J. Callahan, an attorney at law, appeals from an order imposing sanctions against him in the amount of $1,500 pursuant to section 177.5. The following…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moyal v. LanphearCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- People v. Frankie J.California Court of Appeal · 1988
- People v. ChongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- People v. WardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Winikow v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. Landers, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. WhitusAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2012
- N.D. v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2026
- People v. Brown CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. LandersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.