Legal Opinion

Wooten v. Amspacher

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 15, 1983No. 21976PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Justice:

Appellant initiated this medical malpractice action under the survival statute for injuries, pain, and suffering alleged to have arisen out of an operation performed by the respondent. The jury returned a verdict for respondent. Appellant alleges the trial court erred in denying her motion for a new trial. We agree and reverse.

First, appellant contends the court erred in admitting evidence concerning her separation from her husband prior to his death and her subsequent remarriage after his death. Previously we held this evidence is not admissible in a wrongful death action…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Spartanburg Ry., Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
  2. Smith v. WellsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  3. Schreiberg v. Southern Coatings & Chemical Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1957

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moultrie v. Medical Univ. of SCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Fay ex rel. Estate of Fay v. Grand Strand Regional Medical Center, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API