Legal Opinion

Fay ex rel. Estate of Fay v. Grand Strand Regional Medical Center, LLC

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided April 1, 2015No. Appellate Case No. 2010-167127; No. 5306PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKonduros, J.

In this cross-appeal from a medical malpractice action, Sean Fay (Sean) argues the trial court erred in granting Dr. Richard Young’s motion for a directed verdict on public policy grounds. In the appeal against Sean, Dr. Stephen Law argues the trial court erred in (1). denying his motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV), (2) excluding evidence of Sean’s admitted extramarital affair, and (3) refusing to enroll the judgment against him using the jury’s determination of six percent negligence on his part and instead using joint and several liability. We affirm.

FACTS/PROCEDURAL…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Baughman v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. Law v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Nelson v. Concrete Supply CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  4. Erickson v. Jones Street Publishers, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  5. Summer v. CarpenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brandon Potts v. The United States of America, et al.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2026
  2. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE OF AMERICA, INC. v. MARTHA WHITLOCKCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API