Legal Opinion

Tindall v. Smith

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 26, 1992No. 92-00605PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

601 So.2d 627 (1992)

Nathaniel W. TINDALL, II, Appellant,

v.

Hugh N. SMITH, Appellee.

No. 92-00605.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 26, 1992.

Rick A. Mattson of Mattson, McGrady & Todd, P.A., St. Petersburg, for appellant.

Hugh N. Smith and Robert E. Brazel of Smith & Fuller, P.A., Tampa, for appellee.

PARKER, Judge.

Nathaniel Tindall appeals the trial court's nonfinal order granting Hugh Smith's motion for change of venue. We reverse, concluding that the trial court abused its discretion in transferring venue as the record does not reflect the existence of the circumstances…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Adams v. Knabb Turpentine Co., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Bingham v. MansonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  3. Groome v. AbramsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. McMichael v. HarrisSupreme Court of Florida · 1937

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Management Computer v. Perry Const.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP v. Cedar Resources, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  3. Dive Bimini, Inc. v. RobertsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  4. Blackhawk Quarry Co. v. HEWITT CONTRACTINGDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  5. Darby v. ATLANTA CASUALTY INS. CO.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API