Legal Opinion
Ainsworth v. Schoen
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 3, 1992No. 92-468PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
606 So.2d 1275 (1992)
Tsvi AINSWORTH, Mendy Felig and/or Mendel Fellig, Appellants,
v.
David SCHOEN, Appellee.
No. 92-468.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
November 3, 1992.
Douglas H. Stein, Stewart, Damsky, Markus & Konski and Luis S. Konski, Miami, for appellants.
Cohen, Berke, Bernstein, Brodie & Kondell, P.A., and Jeanne Katz Spital, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.
JORGENSON, Judge.
Ainsworth and Fellig appeal from a final summary judgment confirming an arbitration award entered in favor of Schoen. For the reasons that follow, we reverse.
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Meisels v. UhrNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Air Conditioning Equipment, Inc. v. RogersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Mikel v. ScharfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- In re the Arbitration between Mikel & ScharfNew York Supreme Court · 1980
3Cited by3 opinions
- DIAL 800 v. FesbinderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- City of Tallahassee v. Big Bend PBADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Spivey v. Teen Challenge of Florida, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013