Legal Opinion

Forer v. Quincy Mutual Fire Insurance Company

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 11, 1972PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBBER, Justice.

Plaintiffs brought suit in the District Court on a “homeowners” policy issued to them by the defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiffs sought to recover their loss claimed to have resulted from the freezing of the plumbing and heating systems contained in a portion of their premises. The basic policy was in the standard form required by 24 M.R.S.A., Sec. 1402. 1 The “Homeowners Mandatory Endorsement” added thereto enlarged the covered perils and included:

“17. Freezing of plumbing, heating * * * systems and domestic appliances, but excluding loss resulting from freezing while the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jefferson Insurance of New York v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. McAvoy v. RushSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Driscoll v. GheewallaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  2. Elberon Bathing Co., Inc. v. Ambassador Insurance Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  3. Bigney v. BlanchardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  4. Gendron v. Pawtucket Mutual InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  5. State v. MICHAEL Z.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API