Legal Opinion

Rosewood Care Center, Inc. v. Caterpillar, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 7, 2006No. 3-05-0299PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holdridge

Plaintiff Rosewood Care Center (Rosewood) filed suit against Caterpillar, Inc., seeking payment for services it provided to Caterpillar employee Betty Jo Cook while she was a patient at Rosewood. Plaintiff sought reimbursement based on Caterpillar’s alleged promise to pay. Caterpillar filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the statute of frauds barred Rosewood’s suit. The trial court found that the statute of frauds did indeed bar Rosewood’s suit and dismissed the complaint. We hold that, under the current state of the law, the statute of frauds does not bar Rosewood’s suit. We therefore…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kossick v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Krilich v. American National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  3. Edens View Realty & Investment, Inc. v. Heritage Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. Prodromos v. PoulosAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  5. Dickens v. Quincy College Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Rosewood Care Center, Inc. v. Caterpillar, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Ringgold Capital IV, LLC v. FinleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  3. People v. HarrisonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016
  4. Brown, Udell and Pomerantz, Ltd. v. RyanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  5. Doyle v. HoodAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API