Legal Opinion

Matter of Bolden

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 1, 1980No. 8026SC146PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

In the judgment appealed from the court expressly found that the facts found by the Commission were based upon competent evidence contained in the record. The court nevertheless reversed the Commission’s decision, basing its ruling upon its finding that the Commission “did not properly apply the law to those and other facts in evidence.” (Emphasis added.) In reversing the Commission on the basis of “other facts in evidence,” the Court committed error.

In reviewing decisions of the Employment Security Commission as authorized by G.S. 96-15(i), the superior court functions as an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of EnochCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State Ex Rel. Employment Security Commission v. Paul's Young Men's Shop, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources v. CarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
  3. Eason v. Gould, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Dunlap v. Clarke Checks, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Marlow v. North Carolina Employment Security CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API