Legal Opinion

Hogan Exploration, Inc. v. Placid Oil Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 3, 1983No. 82-532PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KNOLL, Judge.

The sole issue on appeal is the use of a writ of mandamus by appellees, Hogan Exploration, Inc., John J. Saye, Christie lies Saye, Erwin Saye, Nan Dobson Saye, John J. McKeithen, Marjorie Funderburk McKeithen, Robert F. Meredith, III, Cary-lyn Hancock Meredith, Richard Keller, Ann Dunn Keller, Thomas L. Gibbs, Pamela Thomas Gibbs, Troy J. Cox, Marlin Exploration, Inc., Alton H. Howard and Mamie Meador Howard to compel Placid Oil Company to pay a sum of money for oil purchased when a serious dispute as to title of the minerals was not resolved. We reverse.

Placid filed a motion for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. Southern Kraft CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
  2. State Ex Rel. Muslow v. Louisiana Oil Refining Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. State Ex Rel. Boykin v. Hope Producing Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Levy v. BilleaudLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Scott v. Hunt Oil Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hogan Exploration, Inc. v. Placid Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API