Edwards v. Johnson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1DissentLake, J.
There is no significant conflict in the testimony of the plaintiff and the investigating officer as to how the shooting occurred. The motion for judgment of nonsuit must be determined upon the facts related by them and inferences, favorable to the plaintiff, which may reasonably be drawn therefrom. The questions to be resolved are: (1) Are these facts and inferences sufficient to support a finding that the defendant was negligent in her handling of the shotgun? (2) If so, do these facts and inferences lead necessarily to the conclusion that the plaintiff was negligent in going to the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Kuhns v. BruggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Mattson v. Minnesota & North Wisconsin RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Jensen v. MinardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Rudd v. ByrnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Brittingham v. . StadiemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.